Procedings from the Symposium: Biomarkers, the
Genome & the Individual, Workplace and Medical Implications of a Rapidly
Evolving Tachnology, May 4-8, 1997, Medical University of South Carolina,
Charleston, South Carolina. A publication of the National Academy
of Sciences, 1998.
Characterizing reproductive risks using biomarkers of reproductive toxicity.
Mattison DR, Mazumdar S, Xu Y, Sussman
N, and Arena VC.
ABSTRACT
Recently attention has been directed toward risks and risk factors which
impair reproduction and development (Wilcox, et al., 1988; Wilcox, et al.,
1990; Schardein, 1993). For example, exposure in dental offices to
scavanged
nitrous oxide (concentrations estimated between 100 and 1,000 ppm)
for five or more hours per week decreases fertility to less than half that
observed in dental offices where the anesthetic gas is scavenged (Rowland,
et al., 1992). Several studies, including a recently concluded industry-wide
evaluation, have demonstrated an increased risk of spontaneous abortion
among women working in the fabrication of semiconductors (Eskenazi, et
al., 1995a and b; Swan, et al., 1995; Schenker, et al., 1995). The
fertility among men working in semiconductor fabrication was also studied
by these investigators and appears to be decreased in comparison to men
in other work settings in the semiconductor industry (Samuels, et al.,
1995). For many years it has been observed that cigarette smoking
decreases male and female fecundity as well as decreasing fertility and
increasing the time needed to achieve pregnancy (Baird and Wilcox, 1985;
Mattison, 1982; Weinberg, et al., 1989; Ratcliffe, et al.,
1992). Recently, the US EPA, in its reanalysis of the human health
risk assessment for dioxin has suggested that adverse reproductive and
developmental effects may be the most critical and sensitive endpoints
(EPA, 1997). This article will present definitions of reproductive
toxicology, describe biomarkers of reproduction, suggest an approach for
characterizing reproductive toxicity in the context of risk assessment,
and illustrate this approach
with a recently developed risk assessment approach using two reproductive
biomarkers simultaneously.
|